Review



ht 29 m6  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    ATCC ht 29 m6
    Ht 29 M6, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 17 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht 29 m6/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 17 article reviews
    ht 29 m6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    ATCC ht 29 m6
    Ht 29 M6, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht 29 m6/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht 29 m6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC htb 38d
    Htb 38d, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/htb 38d/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    htb 38d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC human gdna ht29
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Human Gdna Ht29, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human gdna ht29/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gdna ht29 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC htb 38d human gdna sw48 atcc
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Htb 38d Human Gdna Sw48 Atcc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/htb 38d human gdna sw48 atcc/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    htb 38d human gdna sw48 atcc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC htb 38d † actual concentration undetermined
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Htb 38d † Actual Concentration Undetermined, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/htb 38d † actual concentration undetermined/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    htb 38d † actual concentration undetermined - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC atcc htb 38d carryover cross contamination
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Atcc Htb 38d Carryover Cross Contamination, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc htb 38d carryover cross contamination/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc htb 38d carryover cross contamination - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ht 29 atcc cat
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Ht 29 Atcc Cat, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht 29 atcc cat/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht 29 atcc cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    ht 29  (ATCC)
    93
    ATCC ht 29
    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented <t>gDNA)</t> is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Ht 29, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht 29/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht 29 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented gDNA) is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Methods

    Article Title: Genome-wide profiling of unmodified DNA using methyltransferase-directed tagging and enrichment

    doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101187

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic of the Active-Seq workflow and initial method validation using synthetic oligonucleotides (A) Schematic showing the single-tube, Active-Seq workflow. Purified DNA (cfDNA or fragmented gDNA) is tagged using a CpG-targeting methyltransferase (M.MpeI) and a synthetic cofactor analog. The enzyme catalyzes DNA alkylation with azide-terminated tags exclusively at unmodified CpG sites. Tagged DNA molecules are subsequently subject to standard library end repair and adapter ligation, followed by affinity tagging and isolation using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Tagged (unmodified CpG sites, Active-Seq) and untagged (5mCpG and other modified CpG sites and CpG-free fragments, unbound fraction) DNA can be separately amplified and sequenced. (B) Plot showing the efficiency for DNA binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA, using 10 ng target DNA input, as a function of target DNA CpG site density. Binding efficiency is calculated based on the assumption that any reduction in DNA concentration after DNA incubation with beads is as a result of DNA binding to the beads. (C) Plot showing the efficiency for binding and release (recovery) of tagged and affinity-labeled DNA for a decreasing amount of input target DNA against a background of 24 ng of non-target DNA (containing no CpG sites). Note that the recovered DNA concentration was determined by qPCR, and reported recoveries are measured against DNA we expect to be bound to the beads (input DNA quantified via Qubit). (D) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the enriched (unmethylated) fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. (E) Plot showing number of reads of spiked-in DNA oligos (5, 25, and 50 pg in total) in the unbound fraction with four unmethylated CpG sites (4 uMe CpG), four methylated CpG sites (4 Me CpG), and no target CpG sites (0 CpG) from a typical Active-Seq experiment. Data in bar-plots are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Two-way ANOVA test: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 , ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Human gDNA: HT29 , ATCC , cat#: HTB-38D.

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Purification, Adapter Ligation, Isolation, Magnetic Beads, Modification, Amplification, Binding Assay, Labeling, Concentration Assay, Incubation, Methylation